This recipe produces a complete, stage-appropriate pitch deck structure for pre-seed, seed, or Series A fundraising — with the exact slide order, required content per section, and a pre-send checklist that catches the most common mistakes investors use to reject decks. The output is a slide-by-slide outline document ready for content population. [src1]
Which path?
├── User is non-technical AND budget = free
│ └── PATH A: Google Slides — free, collaborative, easy to share
├── User is non-technical AND budget > $0
│ └── PATH B: Canva Pro ($12.99/mo) — templates, design assets
├── User is design-aware AND budget = free
│ └── PATH C: Figma (free tier) — pixel-perfect control
└── User has existing tools
└── PATH D: PowerPoint / Keynote
| Path | Tools | Cost | Speed | Output Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A: Google Slides | Google Slides | $0 | 2-3 hrs | Good — clean with right template |
| B: Canva Pro | Canva | $12.99/mo | 1-2 hrs | Good — polished templates |
| C: Figma | Figma free | $0 | 3-4 hrs | Excellent — pixel-perfect |
| D: PowerPoint/Keynote | Microsoft/Apple | $0-$9.99/mo | 2-3 hrs | Good — depends on template |
Duration: 15 minutes · Tool: Decision framework
Identify the funding stage and corresponding narrative goal. The narrative arc changes fundamentally between stages. [src5]
Pre-Seed: No product yet. Narrative: "Massive problem, we're the team to solve it" (8-10 slides)
Seed: Working product, early users. Narrative: "Problem is real, solution works, early traction" (10-12 slides)
Series A: PMF signals, growing revenue. Narrative: "Model works, proof it scales" (12-15 slides + appendix)
Verify: You can state the funding stage and one-sentence narrative arc. · If failed: Default to seed structure — it works for pre-seed meetings with minor adjustments.
Duration: 30 minutes · Tool: Presentation software
Create slides using the exact structure for your stage. Order matters — investors expect this flow. [src1] [src3]
Seed Deck (10-12 slides):
1: Title 2: Problem 3: Solution 4: Why Now 5: Market Size
6: Product 7: Business Model 8: Traction 9: Competition
10: Team 11: Ask 12: Appendix (optional)
Series A Deck (12-15 slides):
1: Title 2: Traction Summary 3: Problem 4: Solution 5: Market Size
6: Product Deep Dive 7: Unit Economics 8: Go-to-Market 9: Traction Detail
10: Competition 11: Financial Projections 12: Team 13: Ask
14: Appendix A (Financials) 15: Appendix B (Social Proof)
Verify: Slide count matches stage target. Every slide has a single clear purpose. · If failed: Merge related topics or move detail to appendix.
Duration: 45 minutes · Tool: Presentation software + notes
Populate each slide following the Sequoia framework. Each slide answers one question. [src3]
Title: Company name + ≤10 word tagline + contact
Problem: 3 bullet points max. Who feels the pain, current alternatives
Solution: Product screenshot + 3 key benefits
Why Now: 1-2 market trends making this possible today
Market Size: TAM, SAM, SOM with bottoms-up calculation
Traction: Ordered most→least impressive. Include timeframes
Competition: 2x2 matrix positioning. Never claim "no competition"
Team: Photo + name + ONE achievement per person
Ask: Dollar amount + use of funds + 3 milestones
Verify: Each slide has ≤30 words body text (seed) or ≤50 words (Series A). · If failed: Split dense slides or move details to appendix.
Duration: 15 minutes · Tool: Presentation software
Reorder middle sections from strongest to weakest content. YC advises ordering from most impressive to least impressive between the opening and the ask. [src1]
IF strongest = traction → Lead with Traction after Title
IF strongest = team → Lead with Team after Problem
IF strongest = product → Lead with Product after Solution
Always keep: Title first, Ask last. Problem before Solution.
Verify: Slide titles alone tell a coherent story. · If failed: Add transition slide or restructure narrative arc.
Duration: 20 minutes · Tool: Checklist
Verify every item before sending to any investor. These are the top rejection reasons. [src7] [src4]
FORMAT: Slides within limit, font ≥28pt body, ≤6 lines per slide, consistent colors
CONTENT: Problem has persona, solution has screenshot, market is bottoms-up,
competition acknowledged, traction has timeframes, ask is specific
FATAL ERRORS: No "no competition" claim, no vanity metrics without context,
no vague ask range, no missing contact info
Verify: Every checkbox passes. · If failed: Fix fatal errors first: (1) no clear ask, (2) no traction, (3) claiming no competition.
{
"output_type": "pitch_deck_structure",
"format": "slide outline document + checklist",
"columns": [
{"name": "slide_number", "type": "number", "description": "Position in deck", "required": true},
{"name": "slide_title", "type": "string", "description": "Section title", "required": true},
{"name": "key_question", "type": "string", "description": "The one question this slide answers", "required": true},
{"name": "required_content", "type": "string", "description": "Must-have elements", "required": true},
{"name": "max_words", "type": "number", "description": "Maximum body text word count", "required": true},
{"name": "stage_specific_notes", "type": "string", "description": "How content differs by stage", "required": false}
],
"expected_row_count": "10-15",
"sort_order": "slide_number ascending",
"deduplication_key": "slide_number"
}
| Quality Metric | Minimum Acceptable | Good | Excellent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Slide count vs target | Within 2 of stage target | Exactly at target | At target with strong appendix |
| Word count per slide | < 50 words | < 30 words | < 20 words + visual |
| Traction data included | At least 1 metric | 3+ metrics with timeframes | Cohort data + growth curves |
| Source citations in market slide | 1 source | 2-3 sources | Primary research + 2 third-party |
| Time to present | < 20 minutes | < 15 minutes | 10 minutes with Q&A buffer |
If below minimum: Simplify weakest slides. Move detail to appendix. Focus on Problem/Solution/Traction (seed) or Traction/Unit Economics/GTM (Series A).
| Error | Likely Cause | Recovery Action |
|---|---|---|
| Deck exceeds slide limit | Trying to cover too many topics | Move detailed sections to appendix |
| Investor requests more detail | Slide too high-level for due diligence | Prepare 2-3 backup slides per main section |
| Reads as "all vision, no proof" | Insufficient traction or market data | Add concrete numbers: waitlist signups, LOIs, or pilot results |
| Narrative feels disconnected | Slides built independently | Re-read slide titles as a sequence; should form logical argument |
| Design looks unprofessional | Inconsistent formatting | Use single template; limit to 2 fonts; 2x resolution images |
| Component | Free Tier | Paid Tier | At Scale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presentation tool | Google Slides: $0 | Canva Pro: $12.99/mo | Figma: $12/mo per editor |
| Template | Free from YC, Sequoia | Slidebean: $29/mo | Custom design: $2,000-5,000 |
| Design review | Peer feedback: $0 | Freelance: $200-500 | Agency: $3,000-10,000 |
| Financial model | Google Sheets: $0 | Causal: $50/mo | CFO consultant: $5,000+ |
| Total for seed deck | $0 | $200-500 | $5,000-15,000 |
Seed investors evaluate hundreds of decks. A 25-slide deck signals the founder cannot prioritize. Most investors stop reading after slide 12. [src1]
Move detailed content to clearly labeled appendix slides. The main deck tells the story; the appendix provides evidence on demand.
This is the fastest way to lose investor credibility. Every problem has existing solutions. [src7]
Use a 2x2 matrix showing where competitors sit and where you differentiate. Acknowledge competitors and explain your defensible advantage.
Series A investors start with traction and work backward. Leading with a large TAM before showing customer data signals selling dreams. [src2]
Open with your strongest metric (MRR, user growth, retention rate), then build the story from there.
Use this recipe when a founder needs to create a pitch deck from scratch or restructure an existing deck for a specific funding stage. Requires the business concept to exist — this recipe handles deck structure and slide ordering, not business strategy or idea validation.